Kaur v. R. – TCC: GST Assessment – Taxpayer/Director Did Not Establish Due Diligence DefensePlus >
Fisher v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer Did Not Prove Debt Had Become BadPlus >
Terry Piersanti v. R. – TCC: Jarvis Decision Does Not Block the Introduction of Documents in a Tax Court AppealPlus >
Hayfron-Benjamin v. The Queen/Gorfain v. The Queen: Identity Theft and the Income Tax ActPlus >
Turcotte v. The Queen – TCC: The Meaning of “Reasonable Grounds for the Appeal”Plus >
Chadwick v. R.– FCA: Minor Changes to Support Agreement in Divorce Decree do Not Result in Loss of GrandfatheringPlus >
Clearwater Seafoods Holdings Trust v. R. – FCA: Where Trust Dissolved Rule 29(1) of the Tax Court Rules Permits Substituted AppellantPlus >
A OK Payday Loans Inc. v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer’s GST Refund Claim Out of Time, Court Recommends an Application for a Remission OrderPlus >
Industries Perron Inc. v. R. – FCA: Posting of Security for Softwood Lumber Duties is Not a Deductible ExpensePlus >
506913 N.B. Ltd. v. The Queen – Tax Court Holds GST Auditors did not Violate the Jarvis RulePlus >