Jack Klundert v. R. – After Tax Evasion Conviction an Attempt to Re-litigate in the Tax Court is an Abuse of ProcessPlus >
CalAmp Wireless Networks Inc. v. R. – Pre-Sale Bonuses Paid to SR&ED Employees Not Qualified ExpendituresPlus >
Berty v. The Queen – Agreements to Pay Spousal Support from Contingent Bonuses not “Periodic” and Hence not DeductiblePlus >
Nicholls v. The Queen – Loss on a Promissory Note Payable by a Trust Not an Allowable Business Investment LossPlus >
FLSmidth Ltd. v. The Queen: Non-Business Income Tax Deduction Denied as “Related To” a Share of a Foreign AffiliatePlus >
Tele-mobile Company Partnership v. The Queen: When a rebate isn’t a rebate for GST/HST purposesPlus >
Pilford Estate v. The Queen: Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence Not Enough to Support a Claim for Tax Exemption under the Indian Act as Connections to Reserve Were Too SlimPlus >
Bower v. R: Tax Court Rejects Taxpayer’s Claim to be a Resident of Canada Notwithstanding Substantial Connecting FactorsPlus >
Ollenberger v. The Queen: Federal Court of Appeal Affirms Wide Scope for the term “Active Business”Plus >
Federal Court of Appeal: Advisor Penalties Under Section 163.2 of the Income Tax Act Are Not Criminal Offences and Do Not Attract the Protection of Section 11 of the CharterPlus >