Précis: In this decision the Minister argued that three family members working for two family companies were engaged in insurable employment since they had “entered into substantially similar contracts of employment [as] if they had been dealing with the employer at arm’s length” (para. [6]). The Court rejected this conclusion finding that the terms of their work arrangement did not accord with comparable private sector positions.
V.Y.F. Express inc. v. R. - TCC: Family members not engaged in insurable employmentREAD MORE »