Garfin v. R. – TCC: Lawyer’s legal assistant an employee and not an independent contractorREAD MORE »
Enseignants de Langue Anglaise de Montréal. v. M.N.R. – TCC: Language instructors not engaged in insurable/pensionable workREAD MORE »
Baldwin v. R. – TCC: Employment income of appellants was not situated on a reserve.READ MORE »
Badour v. R. – TCC: Taxi cab driver working for owner of taxi engaged in insurable/pensionable employmentREAD MORE »
Porotti v. R. – The worker was an independent contractor for EI/CPP purposesREAD MORE »
166020 Canada Inc. v. M.N.R. – TCC: Workers in “Magie Seal” business not employeesREAD MORE »
Grand Oak Law and Landscape v. M.N.R. – TCC: Landscape worker was an employeeREAD MORE »
Ontario Real Estate Association v. R. – TCC: Test centre operators not employeesREAD MORE »
Saindon v. M.N.R. – TCC: Truck driver engaged in insurable and pensionable employmentREAD MORE »
Parsons v. R. – TCC: Appellant was not engaged in insurable employmentREAD MORE »