Fio Corporation v. R. – TCC: CRA sanctioned for breach of the implied undertaking rule and ordered to pay $25,000 in costsREAD MORE »
Bekesinski v. R. – TCC: Expert report lacked evidentiary foundation – expert evidence inadmissibleREAD MORE »
Cameco Corporation v. R. – TCC: Detailed decision outlines terms required in full disclosure under Rule 82READ MORE »
Martin v. R. – TCC: Court sanctions abusive CRA conduct with costs awardREAD MORE »
G & J Muirhead Holdings Ltd. v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer carried on a “personal services business” – appeal dismissedREAD MORE »
Yourkin v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer claiming to have paid spousal support cannot attack a judgment to which he was partyREAD MORE »
Swirsky v. R. – FCA: Taxpayer unsuccessful in appeal of loss attribution planREAD MORE »
International Custom Pak Inc. v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer not granted relief against duties on unapproved alcohol gelREAD MORE »
R. v. Dickie – FCA: Federal Court of Appeal sustains award of 60% of actual costs – appeal dismissed from the benchREAD MORE »
Dr. Mike Orth Inc. et al. v. R. – FCA: Taxpayers had failed to establish an evidentiary basis to deduct legal feesREAD MORE »