Transalta Corporation v. Canada – FCA: Court Declines to Increase Cost Award – TCC Judge Acted Within His DiscretionREAD MORE »
Mittal v. R. – TCC: Non-Attorney Engineer Representing Himself Not Entitled to Hourly CostsREAD MORE »
McKenzie v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer Proposal to Allow Appeal Without Costs Not a “Settlement” OfferREAD MORE »
Edwards v. R. – FCA: Federal Court of Appeal Reverses TCC, Adjourns Trial Because of Unenacted Charities RulesREAD MORE »
Roper v. R. – FCA: Federal Court of Appeal Affirms Dismissal of Appeal for Failure to Comply with Costs OrderREAD MORE »
Daishowa-Marubeni International v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer Awarded 1/6 of Actual Costs, Not 1/3 as RequestedREAD MORE »
A&E Precision Fabricating and Machine Shop Inc. v. R. – FCA: Tax Court has no Jurisdiction over Collection MattersREAD MORE »
Nicholls v. The Queen – Loss on a Promissory Note Payable by a Trust Not an Allowable Business Investment LossREAD MORE »
Pilford Estate v. The Queen: Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence Not Enough to Support a Claim for Tax Exemption under the Indian Act as Connections to Reserve Were Too SlimREAD MORE »
Myrdan Investments Inc. v. The Queen – Taxpayers Awarded One Third of Their Out of Pocket Costs (154% of the Tarriff) Because of CRA’s IntransigenceREAD MORE »